SHORT HISTORY OF NATURAL PROGRAMMING
In classical metaphysics and up to Darwinian biology the principle of objective idealism was predominant and the majority of great scientists from Ibn Sina (Avicenna) and Paracelsus to Dmitry Mendeleyev and Oliver Heavyside, who discovered the magnetic charge and created operational calculation, certainly, were deeply believing people. For example, it is known that Mihajlo Lomonosov and Isaak Newton, as well as Paracelsus, were secretly engaged in searches of philosophers' stone formula and, what is the most important thing, have succeeded in their searches while finding answers to their super-task and the primary goal of alchemy. The epistolary heritage of Mihajlo Lomonosov or last English publications of complete works of Isaak Newton testify to it.
According to what spoke and wrote one of the main theorists of atheistic scientific and technical revolution of the 20th century Albert Einstein, he also was a believing person with metaphysical concepts on surrounding space and a deterministic view on the course of events. From here comes aversion of the likelihood concept of quantum mechanics and advancing of his counterbalancing principle of locality, establishing, as a matter of fact, the presence of interconnection that means of definiteness and predictability in behavior of all elements of the Universe.
In this respect, all "natural sciences" before the 20th century leant against the strong base, created by great predecessors of the East and the West: the richest experience and long-lasting heritage of the ancient Indians, who have created the Indian medicine – Ayurveda, the ancient Chinese, who have created acupuncture, the experience of Ancient Greek schools of Hippocratus and Aristotle, the experience of great doctors and philosophers of our era and, of course, of doctors and alchemists of the second millennium of a new era such as Ibn Sina (980-1037) and Paracelsus (1493-1541) or, let's say, Benvenuto Cellini (1500-1571), who, besides the fact he was a great sculptor, goldsmith and writer, also became famous as an outstanding scientist-alchemist, crystal lighter and doctor.
The 20th century brought about certain amendments to smooth evolutionary development of scientific thought. Creation and demonstration, at the end of the 19th century, of wireless electric communication, introduction of telegraph and, then, of telephone, sound recordings, cinema and, finally, TV and computer equipment, marked triumphal, all over the world, procession of scientific and technical revolution, which side-effects are: creation of powerful consumption medium, rough atheism, deviation from the core moral-ethical values, and loss of integral scientific perception of a whole layer of phenomena, inexplicable from the standpoint of dialectic materialism.
Such a state of affairs has led to the fact that by the end of the 20th century there appeared a situation where, according to a number of leading scientists, only 1/100 part of the phenomena observed by physicists could have been explained from the standpoint of traditional physical conceptions. The fundamental physics and the overall science, obviously, require further development. Not without reason, Nils Bor has noticed that "physics could not be full unless the consciousness factor is taken into consideration". It is so.
Meanwhile, at the congresses of all outstanding contemporary physicists, which were carried out at the late 20th and until the middle of 30th, to be more precise, at the last congress that took place in Copenhagen and became known under the name the Copenhagen Conference, it was decided to stop all disputes and to assume as a basis of world perception the quantum mechanical model and the Theory of Relativity, and further – to continue to experiment, publishing, without superfluous noise, reports, without commenting on inviolable likelihood-materialistic principles and the somewhat truncated version of the Theory of Relativity, from which its idealistic basis was withdrawn.
All collisions in mutual relations between scientists at the said physicists’ congresses and, in general, in the 20th century were reduced to the dispute around the deterministic principle of locality and a likelihood principle of complementarity. The first principle has been put forward by the group of Einstein, Podolsky and Rozen, and was supported by idealistic, less organized minority among which, certainly, were great Nikola Tesla and Erwin Schrodinger, who easily declined his own quantum-mechanical model and published, subsequently, in 1944 his well-known work “What is life? The physical aspect of the living cell”, in which he asked quite inconvenient to the majority of physicists questions, touching the most inviolable topics. The book was ignored. Schrodinger was too outstanding to be subject to criticism.
The second principle was put forward by a group of known scientists in the scientific world, led by Nilson Bor. His concept, along with relativity model, as it will seem surprising, assumed at signal transmission from one object to another, additional presence of the third party observer, knowing all the details of the information transmission process. Big packages of information could be encrypted and neither the distance, nor the volume of information is relevant. Important is to know the time of the message and the course of action, related to the third party observer.
The described collision is so more amazing that both principles are easily reduced to one physical reality – to existence, practically, of an instant information mode of signal transmission between similar objects. It is not so relevant if there is an additional intermediary in the process of such transmission or if its role is performed by a certain exclusive system of reference (which existence, by the way, has been omitted in the traditional description of the Theory of Relativity). In mathematics, this way of communication between similar systems (objects) is called conformal mapping, and it constitutes the basis of an ancient method of reception of information, its recording, storage and reproduction, used by all living beings in the Universe, and, of course, by humans.
Thus, the truth has reconciled two arguing groups of very serious scientists, and disputes have stopped.
However, when to Albert Einstein, in the early 40th, the Military Department of the USA suggested to head the project "Rainbow" to find a method, allowing to make objects invisible, the scientist told that nobody else understands physics like Nikola Tesla. And this was the exact truth.
As a matter of fact, nobody from the great scientists, secretly engaged in alchemy, neither Galilei, Kopernik, Lomonosov, Mendeleyev, Einstein, nor Planck were able to convince their contemporaries in validity of their claims regarding complete truth of their knowledge. Only Tesla did that. Not only he convinced his contemporaries, but also forced them to blindly believe in his own scientific insight and infallibility. For example, the outstanding Indian philosopher Swami Vivekananda, upon visiting the laboratory, in which Tesla worked, wrote that Tesla is a great guru, because Vivekananda observed how Tesla quite seriously talked to the electromagnetic field.
So, Tesla became the leader of the "Rainbow" project, in the result of which, after Tesla's death in Christmas of 1943, in the autumn of the same year, during a regular experiment, disappeared, and then again appeared without more than half of crew the destroyer "Eldridzh". The part of the crew that disappeared was never found, and the other part was declared mad, because some crew members asserted that they visited the future. But this is already the topic of another, more detailed, than the given review, conversation.
Nikola Tesla believed that the Earth, the Universe and Vacuum are not simply media, as it was considered by the majority of such outstanding contemporaries as Nils Bor, Verner Gejzenberg and Max von Laue, who discovered the X-rays diffraction on crystals. Тesla considered the Earth, the Universe and Vacuum living systems, with all subsequent consequences. Therefore, the mental logic chain, stretched from Patanjali, the author of "Yoga Sutras" to Zarathustra, the author of "Avesta", and from him – to Nikola Tesla, the author of well-known "Testament", which he ordered to open in 2008, after a centenary of the events connected with the Tunguska meteorite, seems to be so obvious.
The expected date passed, the "Testament" was opened and people found the detailed description of the experiment, which entailed the events on the Tunguska River that was attacked by plasmoids, sent by the scientist, and the polar lights in many cities, situated on the same latitude with Tunguska, including in Saint-Petersburg.
At the same time, organizing a "plasmoid" attack to Tunguska River and the polar lights all over the world, and seeing the power of the obtained tools, Tesla understood all inopportuneness of his innovations. In other words, he considered the launch of his information model in 1908, when the scientific and technical revolution just started to advance, premature.
Indeed, it is difficult to imagine, on the one hand, the modern tele-radio communication, and on the other hand – the Tesla model, using in quality of antennas the magnetic field power lines of the Earth, which, in such situation, becomes not only a medium, but also a receiver and, simultaneously, a source of information (radiator). If the Tesla's system is launched, all the modern scientific and technical revolution's infrastructure will simply fail: the tele-radio communication will be broken, all planes will fall, the satellites will be damaged etc.
However, it is obvious that Tesla considered the year 2008 as time, suitable for implementation of a new information communication model, in other words – time for energy and information revolution startup.
We live, as the great Serb Tesla believed, in the century of new information revolution. Therefore, it is a high time to be engaged in information programming that, actually, constitutes the essence of the new method of communication, recording, storage and reproduction of information.
Let's briefly dwell on what natural programming represents.
NATURAL PROGRAMMING TECHNOLOGY
The concept of "natural programming" is new, although people used its methods from times immemorial. Homeopathic medicines could serve a good example of natural programming.
Natural programming represents a set of methods of transfer of information from the verbal sphere to memory, preservation of memory for as long time as it is required, and its further unobstructed reproduction, whenever possible, in fuller volume.
Natural programming differs from technical and mathematical programming by presence of more complicated operators. In mathematics, the bit of information is used, which, in essence, in a binary code represents the "yes" or "no" answer to a simple question, where 1 (one) stands for "yes", and 0 (zero) stands for "no". Natural programming, however, uses the whole verbal palette: go, breathe, eat, split, integrate etc.
Certainly, such a difficult selection of operators requires entirely different tools than those used in the second half of the 20th century in the result of the scientific and technical revolution, and computer boom. But these tools would be attributes of a totally different Energy and Information Revolution (EIR), which would substitute the delayed Scientific and Technical Revolution (STR).
The thing is in the new method of communication of information, which will radically change the world the way it was changed when the speech and languages appeared. As a matter of fact, then the first EIR happened, so figuratively described in the biblical Tower of Babel story. STR also started with a method of information transfer. That happened not at the end of the 17th century, when J. Watt created the first steam-engine, but at the moment when in 1895 the Russian physicist A.S. Popov showed, for the first time, a method of wireless telecommunications. The Information Revolution will also begin with introduction of a new way of information transfer.
Two ways of transmission of energy and information occur in nature: the traditional way of dissipation at the velocity of light, and the information method that is carried out, practically, instantly via conformal representation. In the mathematics, the section describing conformal representations is called "conformal mapping".
Thus, natural programming uses for recording, storage and reproduction of information an ancient method of conformal mapping. In its essence, it is incommensurably more ancient than even the speech, and in the era of EIR its possibilities will considerably expand. It will be possible to learn about it in details from our further publications and on the site.
Now, let's briefly talk about data recording on natural programming cards.
In this case, as mentioned before, the principle of similarity is used. The process itself is being modulated and the corresponding materials for the data carrier are being selected. Further, a special procedure of transfer of information to the selected composition is made (of cause, data recording procedure also represents a separate topic, beyond the format of the given article). Afterwards, the composition could be put on cards, and from one of them, with the help of a generator, adjusted in a special way, the 24 hours broadcasting is carried out, providing constant correlation of all cards, wherever they are, through the mechanism of conformal mapping.